Write the text of the Results section concisely and objectively. Of course you did, because that is what all good scientists do, and it is a given that you recorded your measurements and observations.
The description must include both physical and biological characteristics of the site pertinant to the study aims.
Problems to Avoid Do not waste time restating your results. Someone else should be able to go to the exact location of your study site if they want to repeat or check your work, or just visit your study area. Does it say what you wanted it to say? If appropriate, the discussion section is also where you state how the findings from your study revealed new gaps in the literature that had not been previously exposed or adequately described, and Engage the reader in thinking critically about issues based upon an evidence-based interpretation of findings; it is not governed strictly by objective reporting of information.
Systematically explain writing a discussion section underlying meaning of your findings and state why you believe they are significant.
Poster text Double-space all text, using left-justification; text with even left sides and jagged right sides is easiest to read. You could do this. The introduction summarizes the relevant literature so that the reader will understand why you were interested in the question you asked.
Same actions, but all the important information is given in a single, concise sentence. In classes involving mathematics and engineeringa recitation is often used as the vehicle to perform derivations or solve problems similar to those assigned to the students.
Do not confuse observations with interpretations; observations in this context refers to highlighting important findings you discovered through a process of reviewing prior literature and gathering data.
The page length of your results section is guided by the amount and types of data to be reported. Confusing figures with tables. Before concluding the discussion, identify potential limitations and weaknesses if you do not plan to do so in the conclusion of the paper.
Avoid repeatedly using a single sentence to relate a single action; this results in very lengthy, wordy passages.
How do these results relate to the original question? In recitations that supplement lectures, the leader will often review the lecture, expand on the concepts, and carry on a discussion with the students. Authors usually write the text of the results section based upon the sequence of Tables and Figures.
Once your hypothesis has been refined for testing, you will draft the Introduction to your paper. References to previous research: Notice how the substitution in red of treatment and control identifiers clarifies the passage both in the context of the paper, and if taken out of context.
The poster is not a publication of record, so excessive detail about methods, or vast tables of data are not necessary. You may, however, include preliminary results that were used to design the main experiment that you are reporting on.
Graphic materials should be visible easily from a minimum distance of 6 feet. A standard format is used for these articles, in which the author presents the research in an orderly, logical manner. Do the data support your hypothesis? Less food can't count numbers of food Fewer animals can count numbers of animals A large amount of food can't count them A large number of animals can count them The erythrocytes, which are in the blood, contain hemoglobin.
Reciters like Samiran Sanyal, Bratati BandyopadhyayBijoylakshmi Burman, Pinaki Chattopadhyay to name a few, are contributing significantly in this field. Consider the following two examples: Foremost in your description should be the "quantitative" aspects of your study - the masses, volumes, incubation times, concentrations, etc.
However, the act of articulating the results helps you to understand the problem from within, to break it into pieces, and to view the research problem from various perspectives.
As such, you should always approach the selection and interpretation of your findings introspectively and to think critically about the possibility of judgmental biases unintentionally entering into discussions about the significance of your work.
Use their comments to revise your paper yet again. It is characterized by single actions per sentence and lots of unnecessary details. For some studies, age may be an important factor.
For graphs, you should also label the x and y axes.
If there is prior research to indicate this, you need to explain why it was significant or unanticipated.We welcome feedback about these handouts and suggestions for additional handouts. Please email us or call us with your ideas. Get Organized: Lists, Outlines, Notecards, lietuvosstumbrai.com starting to write the paper, take the time to think about and develop a list of points to be made in the paper.
Get Organized: Lists, Outlines, Notecards, lietuvosstumbrai.com starting to write the paper, take the time to think about and develop a list of points to be made in the paper. Writing a Results Section Too Much Information?
The results section is not for interpreting the results in any way; that belongs strictly in the discussion section. The Analytical Writing measure tests your critical thinking and analytical writing skills.
It assesses your ability to articulate and support complex ideas, construct and evaluate arguments, and sustain a focused and coherent discussion. The Difficulties of Writing a Discussion Section. In an ideal world, you could simply reject your null or alternative hypotheses according to the significance levels found by the statistics.
That is the main point of your discussion section, but the process is usually a lot more complex than that.Download