How to write a scientific article in psychology

Example There are no extant data on how representative patient populations, such as primary care users, view telehealth interventions. University College Writing Centre. The following sentence provides research significance — in other words, explains why the topic is useful as an environment for scholarly study.

Describe the patterns, principles, and relationships shown by each major findings and place them in proper perspective. It is always difficult to hear let alone accept critique of one's work, especially from one's peers.

If a study that you cited does not support your findings, don't ignore it--clearly explain why your research findings differ from theirs. Relate the Findings to Similar Studies No study in the social sciences is so novel or possesses such a restricted focus that it has absolutely no relation to previously published research.

End with a sentence explaining the specific question you asked in this experiment. It is not easy to include all this information in just a few words. If appropriate, note any unusual or unanticipated patterns or trends that emerged from your results and explain their meaning in relation to the research problem.

Example of a Research Paper

Improving the quality of the editorial process and published science in the field of pediatric psychology is a relentless mission. Your abstract should how to write a scientific article in psychology one paragraph, of words, which summarizes the purpose, methods, results and conclusions of the paper.

Obviously, you must refer to your results when discussing them, but focus on the interpretation of those results and their significance in relation to the research problem, not the data itself.

Knowing an author or having worked with him or her in some way does not necessarily pose a conflict. The current terms of the editorial board and reviewer panel are for 2 more years. If more than one unexpected finding emerged during the study, describe each of them in the order they appeared as you gathered or analyzed the data.

This is important because comparing and contrasting the findings of other studies helps to support the overall importance of your results and it highlights how and in what ways your study differs from other research about the topic.

Remember that the data are the data: Satisfaction with care has only been documented among relatively narrow populations that have already received mental health care via telehealth. Temperature affects the reaction. Consequently, reviewers have the primary ethical responsibility to recognize conflicts of interest and to excuse themselves from a review if they feel that bias could interfere with an impartial review.

The description of findings [results] and the interpretation of their significance [discussion] should be distinct sections of your paper. I injected the drug into the rat. The standards for acceptance of brief reports are exactly the same as for full length manuscripts.

Communicate Consistently with Authors and Managing Editors Managing editors have the responsibility of integrating information from all the reviews including their own to render an editorial decision and generate suggestions to the author to enhance the quality of the manuscript's revision in the event that a revision is recommended.

Example Attitudes Toward Medical and Mental Health Care Delivered Via Telehealth Applications Among Rural and Urban Primary Care Patients Recent reviews of empirical data indicate that psychiatric interviews conducted via telehealth or telepsychiatry are reliable, and that patients and clinicians who use this medium for clinical services generally report high levels of satisfaction Frueh et al.

Use of the first person is generally acceptable. In a cross-sectional survey we sought to examine attitudes towards medical and mental health care delivered via telehealth applications in a sample of adult rural and urban primary care patients.

If you choose to combine the results section and the discussion section into a single narrative, you must be clear in how you report the information discovered and your own interpretation of each finding.

Organizing Your Social Sciences Research Paper: The Discussion

Example 3 Attitudes Toward Medical and Mental Health Care Delivered Via Telehealth Applications Among Rural and Urban Primary Care Patients Appropriate health care services are often not available in many rural and remote areas, and this problem is expected to intensify in the near future, exacerbating existing rural health disparities that need to be addressed Institute of Medicine, The RQ may be expressed as either an actual question or a declarative sentence.

Moreover, it is not uncommon to ask five to six reviewers in order to obtain three reviews.

Scientific Method

Be careful with commonly confused words: So there is clearly room for improvement. Under tight timelines and in the context of multiple responsibilities, reviewers are asked to assume the difficult task of reviewing manuscripts that are often complex and detailed.

How did you answer this question?When we adults went to school, one of the first things we learned was how to write the alphabet, in caps and lower case, and then to hand-write words, sentences, paragraphs, and essays.

For complex topics, present each part separately, then write a paragraph that combines the ideas (honestly, this should make it easier to write -- concepts maps.

A Guide to Writing Scientific Essays These are general points that any good scientific essay should follow. 1. Structure: essays should make an argument: your essay should have a point and reach a conclusion, even if tentative, and you should try to convince the reader that.

Summarizing a Research Article understanding the article. Before you can write about the research, you have to understand it. This takes more time than most students realize. Does the author's study make sense to you in lay terms scientific writing.

Writing in Psychology

Instead, paraphrase what. In the event that a revised manuscript is requested, which is often the case, a review should provide clear, detailed suggestions for specific changes to improve the clarity of writing and the quality of the scientific contribution to the field of pediatric psychology.

Example of a Research Paper

A research article usually has seven major sections: Title, Abstract, Introduction, Method, Results, Discussion, and References. If the purpose of the summary is to take notes to later remind yourself about the article you may want to write a longer summary. However, if the purpose of summarizing the article is to used in scientific.

How to write a scientific article in psychology
Rated 3/5 based on 36 review